Hence, if we could cut out the representational middleman, we would have a theory that defines sentence meaning in dynamic terms, as a transition from one semantic object to another.
The module relies on the set of regular expression-based rules that define sentence breaks.
Our concern is to access sentencing outcomes as a function of behavior and positioning in criminal networks in order to determine whether the judicial processes that define sentences capture and take this behavior into account.
Li et al. [13] defined a sentence similarity measure as a linear combination of semantic vector similarity and word order similarity.
defined a sentence as 'that which indicates what a thing was or is' (D. L. 6.3, DK 45) and stated that someone who says what is speaks truly (DK49).
This feature class is defined as "sentence feature".
A unidimensional language latent factor (defined by sentence repetition, vocabulary knowledge and grammatical skills) provided an excellent fit to the data, and language abilities showed a high degree of longitudinal stability.
Asked the same question, Derek Jeter said, "Why would you want to face an easier team?" Then Jeter uttered the defining sentence, the one that ultimately separates the men in pinstripes from the man in the turtleneck.
Instead, they're needy sufferers defined by sentences like "Isaac would not let Rebecca answer the telephone in his apartment".
Carnap's notion of validity or L-truth is a maximal notion, i.e., Carnap now defines a sentence to be valid or L-true if and only if it holds in all state-descriptions.
Kripke then defines a sentence $A$ of the language of pure substitutional quantificational logic to be valid if, and only if $A$ comes out true no matter what base language $\mathcal{L}$ and non-empty class of terms $\mathcal{C}$ we take as input for the substitutional expansion and what predicates of $\mathcal{L}$ we substitute for the predicates of $A$.
