Exact(7)
If an external symbol of the COMMON-LISP package is not defined as a standardized function, macro, or special operator, it is allowed to lexically bind it as a macro (e.g., with macrolet).
If an external symbol of the COMMON-LISP package is not defined as a standardized function, macro, or special operator, it is allowed to lexically bind its setf function name as a function, and to declare the ftype of that binding.
If an external symbol of the COMMON-LISP package is not globally defined as a standardized dynamic variable or constant variable, it is allowed to lexically bind it and to declare the type of that binding, and it is allowed to locally establish it as a symbol macro (e.g., with symbol-macrolet).
If an external symbol of the COMMON-LISP package is not defined as a standardized function, macro, or special operator, it is allowed to lexically bind it as a function (e.g., with flet), to declare the ftype of that binding, and (in implementations which provide the ability to do so) to trace that binding.
Unless explicitly specified otherwise, if an external symbol of the COMMON-LISP package is globally defined as a standardized dynamic variable, it is permitted to bind or assign that dynamic variable provided that the ''Value Type" constraints on the dynamic variable are maintained, and that the new value of the variable is consistent with the stated purpose of the variable.
LD was defined as a standardized score on the Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT-R; [ 36]) that was at least 1.5 SD below mean for age and below full-scale IQ score on the WISC-III [ 37].
As a first step, the clinical pathway was defined as a standardized pathway representing the operating process (defined as the sequence of all of the elementary steps between the "patient ready for surgery" to the "patient operated upon") and its specific duration.
Similar(1)
It is defined as a model for the delivery of standardized and comprehensive security functionality in accordance with the SaaS model [8, 11].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com