When you define the system this broadly, it takes on a more spiritually suggestive cast.
This article aims first to define the system interoperability concept.
Second, parameters which define the system availability are chosen.
The use of abstract concepts allows us to define the system behavior on higher levels.
The spindle heads selected and their layout define the system productivity and the final cost.
When working with devices such as engines it is often useful to define the system to be an identifiable volume with flow in and out.
Before planning an FSD, it is usual to draw up a context diagram to define the system perimeter.
In this study, we employ a bottom-up approach to better define the system, its input and output, and boundaries.
These kingpins have a clear understanding of the relevant technologies and markets (user needs and functional requirements) and can define the system configuration and coordinate the work of various collaborators.
The "cradle-to-gate" concept to define the system boundaries is the most used approach in practice, instead of the "cradle-to-grave" approach.
On average, an unbranched pathway with control by overall feedback inhibition is less sensitive to perturbations in the values of the parameters that define the system.
