Sentence examples for define a restriction from inspiring English sources

We split the interface ∂ Ω i into four open edges ℰ, and define a restriction operator I E 0 : V h ( ∂ Ω i ) → V h ( ∂ Ω i ) ( V h ( ∂ Ω i ) = V h ( Ω i ) | ∂ Ω i ) as: for any v ∈ V h ( ∂ Ω i ) I E 0 v = { v, on  E, 0, on  ∂ Ω i ∖ E. For the operator I E 0, we have the following result.

Our results indicate that nutrient abundance controls the expression of multiple genes required for a specific step in the proliferation-differentiation programme, defining a restriction point downstream of retinal stem cells.

These results help to define a critical restriction point for CD8+ T cell epitopes in natural cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and potentially in vaccine strategies against this and other viruses.

Our results thus define a nutrient-sensitive restriction point in the proliferation-differentiation programme within retinal progenitor cells in the CMZ, and provide a mechanism whereby growth can be restricted, when nutrients are unavailable, without losing the capacity to reinitiate growth if conditions of plenty return.

In addition, we define a hiding and a restriction operator, complement conjunction with a disjunction operator and illustrate our interface theory by means of a simple example.

The underlined sequence in the REP1-N primer defines EcoRI and SacI restriction sites, whereas the underlined sequence in the REP1-C primer defines a KpnI restriction site.

In the ETSA, there is no need for users to determine the size of a tabu memory and to specifically define a set of tabu restrictions and a set of aspiration criteria.

These restrictions define a set of admissible resource allocation functions that we denote as P : = { p : p ( h ) ∈ P ( h ), for all h ∈ ℋ }. (19).

To overcome this restriction, we define a new three-dimensional contour signature function, based upon the convex hull of the shape and the distance of the convex hull to the closest point of the shape.

We consequently define a simple utility function for restrictions considering the two objectives, and find that Twitter's policy well balances both.

Instead, we imposed two restrictions to define a non-interacting protein pair: first, the two proteins must be present in the same species; second, the two proteins should be localized into different subcellular locations, where the majority of protein-protein interactions are spatially constrained.