Sentence examples for deficiencies paper from inspiring English sources

We have developed Adolescent Micronutrient Quality Index (AMQI) to classify an individual with nutritional deficiencies (Paper III) (62) using the Indian dietary guidelines (24) and the recent US dietary guidelines for choice of healthy foods and habits (23).

To overcome both of these deficiencies, this paper presents frequentist (i.e. classical) and Bayesian regression models that rigorously incorporate variability and uncertainty associated with estimated Hoek-Brown strength parameters.

To overcome these deficiencies, this paper presents a new metal direct RP approach, called hybrid plasma deposition and milling (HPDM) using plasma deposition as an additive and conventional milling as a subtractive technique, which synthesizes the advantages of both processes.

Despite these deficiencies the paper distills a wealth of experience with genome scans from an experienced practitioner of the art and presents a comprehensive delineation of its potential uses in genetics.

To overcome this deficiency, this paper presents a source policy route discovery protocol to supplement BGP.

Focusing on this deficiency, this paper proposed a new algorithm to enhance the gSOC solution.

To overcome this deficiency, this paper proposes a modified KPCA method based on double-weighted local outlier factor (DWLOF-KPCA).

Most importantly, I urge the authors to spend less time selling their story and more effort rigorously testing-not proving-their hypotheses. 1) The major paper deficiency is lack of a clear biological model or mechanism explaining the data.

For example, the data in Figure 1 would have a very different meaning if most of the "repeat" sequences were from just a few species, rather than a diverse set of RNAs. 1) The major paper deficiency is lack of a clear biological model or mechanism explaining the data.

The review process also uncovered several deficiencies in your paper that should be remedied before publication.

I have been amazed at how good our reviewers are at spotting any important deficiencies in a paper and suggesting how these can be addressed – often simply by performing an essential control or by toning down a particular conclusion.