Sentence examples for deficiencies in study design from inspiring English sources

This has been attributed to deficiencies in study design, analysis and inadequate reporting of findings.

Deficiencies in study design and variability in contaminant reductions preclude development of a useful quantitative correction factor for the effects of preparation and cooking on contaminant burden.

26 However, many of these studies had deficiencies in study design and considerable contamination bias, and some have been demonstration projects without a concomitant control group.

Systematic reviews evaluating the methodological conduct and reporting of studies developing prediction models all conclude that these studies are characterised by deficiencies in study design, inadequate statistical methodology, and poor reporting [ 1, 22- 24].

Moreover, an analysis of published studies of glucose meters demonstrated that the studies suffered from deficiencies in study design, methodology, and reporting (134), raising the possibility that the reported total error underestimates the true total error of the meters.

Although most of the literature on these issues has acknowledged these technical problems, analyses of the published results of population studies suggest that the discrepancies among results cannot be attributed only to deficiencies in study design or in the statistical analysis of the data.

All but one study had multiple deficiencies in study designs.

It is noted that meta-analysis studies of the existing data regarding spiral CT in acute PE have shown deficiencies in study designs, indicating that further research is required.

To the extent that these deficiencies are due to omissions in study design, our results raise questions of whether attention to issues in the testing of clinical applications of the biomarker is often overshadowed by the novelty of the laboratory science.

The included studies had clinical heterogeneity caused by variability in the participants (age, gender, comorbidities, preoperative ambulatory status), interventions (instrumentation from different manufacturers, different surgeons) and outcomes (selective reporting, data deficiency), and methodological heterogeneity caused by variability in study design and RoB.

It is also difficult to compare the results of this study with earlier studies due to inconsistencies in study design including the indices and cut-off points used to define iron deficiency, the populations studied, and the variables investigated.