Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(11)
In "The Holocaust in American Life" (Houghton Mifflin, 1999) the historian Peter Novick defended this view, arguing that a "perverse sacralization" of the Holocaust had taken place; he found it "deeply offensive" that the Holocaust had been regarded as a unique, Jewish event.
Throughout his life, Linus Pauling (1901 1994) defended this view.
Lewis defended this view in his most significant book, On the Plurality of Worlds.
So far as I know, no one has defended this view, and I think they are right not to.
It is also not clear that anyone ever seriously defended this view as an answer to the question about how desert claims can be justified.
Thus, for those who defended this view, the answer to the question of "what makes conditional future contingents true" ought to be "nothing".
Similar(49)
The same philosopher who denies freedom freely chooses to present conference papers defending this view.
Although it is possible to hold that the universe is indeterministic and that human actions are nevertheless determined, few contemporary philosophers defend this view.
He defends this view by saying that we must accept that two people, whether friend or stranger, can have the same value, even as their value makes different demands upon people with whom they share different relationships.
(Davidson (1967) and Armstrong (1997) each defend this view albeit in different ways).
(Chaudenson 1992, for instance, defends this view about the origins of French creoles).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com