Sentence examples for defend conclusions from inspiring English sources

A best evidence synthesis is a method of synthesizing evidence used in literature reviews, in which the best available evidence is utilized to produce and defend conclusions [ 11].

As a figure of merit, however, the pooled ROC n score suffers from defects so obvious that other bioinformatics studies (wisely, in our opinion) have gone so far as to defend conclusions drawn from the pooled ROC n score by checking individual retrieval lists (Sierk and Pearson, 2004).

Stimulating analysis and synthesis of data after defending conclusions.

The sheep is market reasoning; the wolf is "might makes right," defending conclusions that allow harm to poor/innocent people on false grounds that harming them increases overall wealth/employment.

Make sure you do research of both sides as you'll have a biased opinion from the start and as you try to prove one side or the other you won't have the full facts, probably ending up with an ill defended conclusion.

Alasdair Smith, who led the investigation by the CMA, appeared before MPs on the Treasury select committee on Tuesday and was forced to defend its conclusions, which focus on boosting competition by encouraging customers to compare their account details with rivals.

First, does the book adequately defend its conclusion that unjustified deprivations of civil liberties have taken place throughout American history during wartime?

But as with the argument from illusion, the argument can be developed, in supplemented form, to defend the conclusion that we only ever perceptually aware of "non-ordinary" objects (see §3.1).

The student must decide which collection of evidence should be given most weight in deriving his or her final gene model and be prepared to defend that conclusion.

However, this case report did not show evidence from biochemical marker analysis or cell-tracking studies to defend their conclusion that the encouraging functional recovery was caused by the effect of grafted cells, and not spontaneously.

On the one hand, " as Farris himself pointed out: "... the decision [the choice amongst competing hypotheses of relationships] is made by accepting the stronger body of evidence over the weaker, and ad hoc hypotheses of homoplasy are required to the extent that evidence must be dismissed in order to defend the conclusion"» [ 22].