Exact(2)
The results of this sample with results of other samples were used previously in studying defect range and nitrogen distribution in comparison with SIMS measurements and TRIM calculations[10].
Reports of the prevalence of this defect range between 17% [ 3] and 86% [ 4].
Similar(58)
The intraoperative evaluation of location and size of the RCT showed that in all subjects the RCTs were located in the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon, and the size of the defect ranged from 4 to 9 cmeanmean 6.3 cm2; SD ± 2.7 cm2.7
According to data available from the literature (Table 2), new bone formation within a 15 mm defect ranges from 17.5 to 24.4% after 12 weeks [ 38, 42, 44].
The size of defect ranged from 7×× 8 cm to 1 × 5 cm in the upper limb (mean 21 cm) and from 25 × 15 cm to 10 × 3 cm (mean 138.5 cm) in the lower limb.
For Zika-infected pregnant women, estimates of the risk of birth defects range widely, from one per cent to thirty per cent.
The DSG approach gives correct results for the defects range from 100 to 1000 μm but it is limited for application to full scale components by the use of FE submodel.
The measured defects range from 0.5 to 7.6 μm in width, corresponding with power levels of 5 100%.
Cerebral defects range from microencephaly, porencephaly in combination hydrocephalus and lack of gyri (lissencephaly) to hydranencephaly with only a small rim of cortical tissue left (Fig. 2b).
Those defects range from extensive non-self-contained (cleft palate and tumoral postresection defects) to extensive self-contained (sinus lift), nonextensive self-contained (postextraction sockets), and nonextensive non-self-contained defects (vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation).
In the literature, heritability estimates reported for congenital defects range from 0.03 to 0.27 [ 1- 3, 9, 16] depending on the population sampled and the statistical model (usually obtained with a sire-model [ 1- 3, 9] except for [ 16]).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com