Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The cut-cell meshing and the k-ε realizable turbulence model with default coefficients values and enhanced wall treatment were used.
Similar(59)
Default coefficient of 0.31 (red traces) generates more errors than the locally calibrated (green traces) Open image in new window Fig. 9 Mean absolute error is higher with default Gardner coefficient.
For example, as far as shales and sands are concerned, which are of greater interest to this study, the use of a default coefficient value of 0.31 in the Gardner equation is unsatisfactory.
Whereas the default coefficient and exponent in the original Gardner equation are 0.31 and 0.25, respectively, fitting the Gardner curve to local data results in a coefficient value of 0.33 and 0.29 for shales and sands, respectively, when the exponent is kept at the default value.
The coefficient of variation of the first three parameters listed in the table can be set in the interface Parameter Default coefficient of variation Yearly demand 25 % PV capacity 50%% Storage capacity 20%% Demand per time step 50%% PV production per time step 20%%.
The model was insensitive to the default Hill coefficient, with Pearson correlation coefficients ≥ 0.93 for 1.01 ≤ n ≤1.7 compared to n = 1.4.
By default all coefficients (up to degree 10; Korte and Constable 2005) used in the modeling are selected.
When a frame exchange sequence is finished, it sets some configurable default weight coefficients which should be good enough to receive a short RTS frame from any station.
From this comparison, the default Gardner coefficient will be perturbed to obtain unique values for the two rock types.
This involved plotting two sets of curves on a cross-plot of density and velocity of sands and shales using the default Gardner coefficient value of 0.31.
The results show that the microblog disclosure is negatively related to the default probability (coefficient is −0.748), and is significant at the 0.01 level.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com