deeply was

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "deeply was" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express a strong emotion or state, but it requires additional context or restructuring to be usable. Example: "She was deeply moved by the performance."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

24 human-written examples

The speaker that struck me most deeply was the first: James Fenton.

The New Yorker

She read widely, loved deeply, was dedicated to feminism and to social, economic and racial justice.

The New York Times

But the piece that resonated most deeply was Josette C. Wiggan's "Bahia".

The New York Times - Arts

So, he asked, how deeply was Vang Pao involved in the case?

The New York Times - Magazine

Yet I felt its power deeply, was as moved by the achievement as any of the principals.

The New York Times - Sports

The two Harvard professors who influenced Berle most deeply was the late William Z. Ripley, and Felix Frankdurter.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

But how deeply is the hatred felt?

The New Yorker

His debut feature --1991's Highgate-set romantic fable Truly, Madly, Deeply - was a successful calling-card, while film number-two - 1993's Mr. Wonderful - broke him into the American film industry.

The Guardian - Film

"It was deeply, deeply satisfying".

The New York Times - Arts

She will be deeply missed as she was deeply loved.

The New York Times

"We are deeply, deeply engaged".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always place the adverb 'deeply' before the verb it modifies. Use the structure 'was deeply' or 'felt deeply' to ensure grammatical correctness.

Common error

Avoid placing 'deeply' after 'was' in standard English. This construction is grammatically incorrect and will confuse readers.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "deeply was" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. The adverb deeply typically precedes the verb it modifies. As Ludwig AI indicates, the standard and correct form is 'was deeply'.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "deeply was" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI points out that the correct word order is "was deeply", where the adverb precedes the verb. The intended purpose is to express a strong emotion or significant impact, but the incorrect word order fails to achieve this effectively. Therefore, it's best to avoid "deeply was" and use the correct form to ensure clear communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was deeply

Reverses the word order to adhere to standard English grammar, positioning the adverb 'deeply' before the verb 'was'.

was deeply affected

Adds 'affected' to clarify that something had a strong emotional impact on someone.

was profoundly

Substitutes 'deeply' with 'profoundly' to emphasize the intensity or significance of the state or experience.

was deeply influenced

Specifies that someone or something had a profound influence, providing a clearer context.

was greatly

Replaces 'deeply' with 'greatly', indicating a substantial degree of influence or impact.

was deeply involved

Indicates a significant level of participation or engagement in something.

was intensely

Uses 'intensely' instead of 'deeply' to highlight the strength or passion of the feeling or involvement.

felt deeply

Changes the structure to emphasize the feeling itself, using 'felt' as the main verb.

was severely

Employs 'severely' to suggest a strong or harsh impact, often in negative contexts.

was truly

Replaces 'deeply' with 'truly', indicating a genuine or sincere state of being.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "deeply" with the verb "to be"?

The correct word order is "was deeply", placing the adverb before the verb. For example, "He "was deeply affected" by the news".

Can "deeply" be used after any form of the verb "to be"?

No, "deeply" should generally precede the verb "to be". Saying "deeply was" is grammatically incorrect. Use alternatives like "was profoundly" or "was intensely" instead.

What are some alternatives to using "deeply" in a sentence?

Depending on the context, you can use adverbs like "profoundly", "intensely", or "greatly". For example, instead of saying "the experience deeply was moving", you could say "the experience "was deeply moving"".

Is "deeply was" ever correct in English?

In standard English, "deeply was" is generally considered incorrect. The typical structure is "was deeply". However, in very rare and specific poetic contexts, unconventional word order might be used for artistic effect, but this is highly unusual.