Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
We then deduce the conclusion from Theorem 3.1.
By Lemmas 5.3 5.4 we can deduce the conclusion as follows.
We can deduce the conclusion directly from the definition.
Then we deduce the conclusion of this lemma.
Once this is established, the Brouwer theorem will be invoked to deduce the conclusion.
end{aligned} Thus, combining (14), (38), and (39), we deduce the conclusion (2).
By these facts, we can deduce the conclusion of Theorem 2.9.
Thus we can deduce the conclusion in terms of Theorem 3.1.
Following the reasoning in the proof of Theorem 2.4 and using instead of, we deduce the conclusion of Theorem 2.6.
Proof Take m 1 = 2 and m 2 = p − 2 in Lemma 3.1, and we can deduce the conclusion.
The fallacy of non-cause occurs in contexts of ad impossibile arguments when one of the assumed premises is superfluous for deducing the conclusion.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com