Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Using the non-parametric sign test they reported a significant decrease in the experimental group (Z= −1.83, p<.05), p5 [ 25].
The results regarding mean restraint intensity and mean multiple restraint use were in agreement with the restraint prevalence – the results showed no decrease in the experimental group and an increase in the control group.
In order to answer our second research question properly, we decided to perform a cognitive/emotional stressor subgroup analysis, including only studies in which movement velocity did not decrease in the experimental condition.
If the direction of change is inconsistent with the literature, IPA predicts that the function will decrease in the experimental sample and if the direction of change is not clear (there is no clear pattern related to the literature), IPA does not make a prediction.
Because of the different relative error term contributions discussed above, the decrease in the experimental group relative error term determined by (1/ mean exp )2 is smaller than the increase in the control group relative error term determined by (1/ mean contr ).
Similar(55)
Our results showed that glucose concentration decreased in the experimental group, although milk production did not significantly increase in this group.
Cholesterol intake decreased in the experimental group (P < 0.001) with no change in the control group.
Percentage of consumed proteins decreased in the experimental group (P < 0.001).
The bone volume of the metaphyseal tibia was significantly decreased in the experimental ACLT tibias, indicating disuse of the experimental ACLT knee.
The intensity of the band decreased in the experimental (denervated) lysate compared with the control, whereas Nedd4 expression increased in the denervated muscle lysates compared with the control.
After the addition of exercise, it further decreased in the experimental group by 4%9595% CI –5.8 to –0.2), whereas it remained unchanged in the control group (group × time P = 0.007; Fig. 2e).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com