Sentence examples for decrease in sums from inspiring English sources

Clinical assessment was performed using RECIST criteria [ 23] as follows; complete response (CR) : disappearance of lesions at 4 wks, partial response (PR): 30% decrease in sums of longest diameters at 4 wks, stable disease (SD): neither PR nor PD criteria met, progressive disease (PD): 20% increase in sums of longest diameters.

The response categories are still those of complete response, partial response (30% decrease in sum from baseline), stable disease and progressive disease (20% increase in sum from nadir).

The response categories are still complete response, partial response (30% decrease in sum from baseline), stable disease and progressive disease (20% increase in sum from nadir).

The best response was defined as the greatest percentage decrease in sum of total SUVmax compared with the total sum at baseline scans.

Moreover, accompanied with a slight increase in the sum of n-6 PUFAs (~11%), the dramatic decrease in sum of n-3 PUFAs made the n 6/n-3 ratio ~115% higher in the DM hearts than in the CON hearts.

(1) complete response (CR), (2) partial response (PR, 30% decrease in sum of baseline), (3) stable disease (SD) and (4) progressive disease (PD, new lesions or 20% increase in sum from nadir).

Despite short school travelling distance, short study duration and non-perfect compliance among the participants included in our ITT-analyses, a significantly decrease in sum of Z score was found in the intervention group compared to the control group.

Interestingly, with respect to sum of skinfolds, there was a significant decrease between the pretest and the posttest for the one-set training group (Table 1; P < 0.05) and a significant decrease in sum of skinfolds for the one-set training group (Table 2; P < 0.05).

Correlations between baseline value and maximum per cent change of plasma marker and efficacy parameters of interest, including maximum decrease in sum of the longest diameters of target lesions from baseline and PFS, were analysed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

The median individual decreases in summed POP concentrations in 1986 , 1994 2001, and 2007 relative to the median concentration in 1979 were –22%, –52%, –54%, and –68%, respectively.

Results: The median decreases in summed serum POP concentrations (lipid-adjusted) in 1986 , 1994 2001, and 2007 relative to 1979 were –22%, –52%, –54%, and –68%, respectively.