The CFU declined as a function of time following the formula: Y(%CFU) = 6.9 × 10-0.044X (R2= 0.74).
Similar to the results in the previous experiments, tracking accuracy declined as a function of tracking set size in Experiment 5 (F 3,33) = 312.78, p < 0.001, ( {eta}_p^2 ) = 0.96).
Regardless of whether the fixed component was aligned with cardinal axes or an intermediate spiral, summation to-coherence-threshold between the two components declined as a function of their difference in spiral pitch.
Extensive evidences in the literature have shown that the glucose metabolism will decline as a function of the aging, while the pathology of neurodegenerative diseases such as AD will further accelerate the declination, providing a perfect application example for implementing and testing the proposed DL-CHI method.
Precipitation of CaCO3, measured as the incorporation of 45Ca, significantly declined as a function of pCO2 at both temperatures.
Furthermore, the expression of HDAC2 mRNA and protein in peripheral lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage macrophages, declined as a function of disease progression [9].
A finding often cited in support of image-based models is that recognition efficiency declines as a function of viewpoint as an object is rotated around a variety of axes from a familiar view [8], [9].
Figure 4c shows raw age declines as a function of older adults' performance; it demonstrates that as the test becomes easier, the raw differences between proportions of younger and older persons diminish, clearly limited by the ceiling, the diagonal line indicating maximum possible age decline for a given level of older adults' (lower scoring group's) performance.
Figure 6 shows the size of raw age declines as a function of older adults' performance for event-cued prospective memory proper, event-cued vigilance and time-cued vigilance tested in the laboratory, and for time-cued prospective memory proper and time-cued habitual prospective memory tested in natural settings.
Analyses of absolute (unscaled) log-transformed values of maximum potential flower production yielded a single most likely model (Table S1a Supplementary Information), in which flower production declined as a function of flower size for the comparison of 11 species (F1,7 = 35.88, P = 0.0005, Fig. 2a).
