Sentence examples for decline in errors from inspiring English sources

The decline in errors has a substantial list of contributing factors, including superior equipment, better-tended fields and more conservative official scorers.

David Blumenthal, president of the Commonwealth Fund, told Cohn that the decline in errors is "historic" and unprecedented in U.S. medical history.

Obvious sources of error, such as seasonality, solar angle variation, and complexity of landcover identification, do not explain the decline in error.

Examination of changes in error with increases in spatial scale demonstrated a gradual decline in error from the plot level with increasing scale.

This decline in error with increasing scale suggests that reported errors from spatial modelling studies are likely to exceed those that occur at the scale of operational application.

Examination of changes in prediction error with spatial scale demonstrated a gradual decline in error from the plot level with increasing scale.

However, the analysis shows that plot-level errors for these surfaces are conservative as there was a marked decline in error for both indices from the plot level to predictions made by averaging across larger scales.

Compared to the decline in error rates (an average of 2.4 percentage points among the 37 states that saw a decrease), the average increase in the remaining 13 states and D.C. where the error rate rose was just 1.7 percentage points.

A decline in prediction error signals from hippocampus (indicating reduced uncertainty) reflects the fact that long terms memories have been updated, i.e. expectancies now match one∼s experiences.

Analogous to the accelerated error rate decline in demanding trial and error learning situations, response slowing during instruction-based S R O learning can be interpreted as a putative index of active O R usage for the online control of goal-directed action selection.

A combined analysis for the total number of errors short- and long-term revealed a trialong-term revealed 527.1) = 4.508, p <.001] and a trial × Strain inteffecton [ F 32.9, 527.1) = 1.757, p <.01], with BALB/c making more errors overall, while both strains showed a gradual decline in the number of errors during the course of the experiment.