Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(14)
The court decided 1,997 cases that were lodged against the UK in 2014; of those, 1,970 (98.7%) were declared inadmissible or struck out.
And in a large percentage of cases where DNA evidence is collected by untrained examiners, it ends up being declared inadmissible in court.
In 1999, Robert Epstein, a federal public defender in Philadelphia, made the first effort to have fingerprint identification declared inadmissible under the Daubert standards.
On Wednesday the court, lumping together a series of legal challenges filed after the election, including some by lawyers for Mr. Capriles, ruled that they "should be declared inadmissible".
In courts around the nation, defense lawyers are using evidence of fingerprinting's fallibility to try to get it declared inadmissible under standards set by the Supreme Court to keep unproven "junk science" out of courtrooms.
The August 2012 lawsuit was declared "inadmissible" in a "resolution" in September that year by judge Henry Antonino Huerta Saenz, who only took into account the request to declare various laws "inapplicable" and ignored the rest.
Similar(41)
At the same time, the phrase declares inadmissible the perfectly real suffering that can be endured by the globally well-off.
The defense wanted to introduce a statement he made to investigators but Judge Raggi's ruling yesterday declared it inadmissible hearsay.
Mr. Gupta's lawyers had argued that because the conversations were between Mr. Rajaratnam and his employees, the judge should declare them inadmissible hearsay evidence, meaning that they were too unreliable to be used against Mr. Gupta.
Because these conversations were between Mr. Rajaratnam and his employees, a judge could declare them inadmissible hearsay evidence, meaning it is too indirect or speculative to be used against Mr. Gupta.
Mr. Gupta's lawyers had argued that because the conversations were between Mr. Rajaratnam and his employees, Judge Rakoff should declare them inadmissible hearsay evidence, meaning that they were too unreliable to be used against Mr. Gupta.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com