Sentence examples for declarations that could have from inspiring English sources

However, when analyzing the descriptive results, there were virtually no striking outliers such as unusually old age declarations that could have been interpreted as voluntary or involuntary false and misleading statements.

It is impossible to conceive today – joking apart – of a "Johnson declaration" that could have even a fraction of the impact of the one made by Balfour.

However, when analyzing the descriptive results, there were virtually no striking outliers, such as unusual declarations of old age that could have been interpreted as voluntary or involuntary false and misleading statements.

Nonetheless, former and current E.P.A. officials and independent scientists now say the declaration was a failure that could have lasting consequences in the next crisis, when health and safety information might save or cost lives.

If he had gone ahead with a unilateral declaration of statehood, diplomats said, he would have risked retaliatory action by Israel that could have put the entire peace process at risk.

In his declaration in court documents, Mustard said he had multiple theories about Huskins' disappearance that could have resulted in criminal charges against certain people.

Alex Gidman has declared the Gloucestershire innings at 306-9 strafter after his brother's century against Leicestershire and the sides shake hands on a match that could have ended more dramatically had the home captain been more adventurous with his declaration.

He would have been no better and might have been worse than Johnson in prosecuting the war, given his declaration that "I could have ended the war in a month.

Obama's declaration that "Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago" was repeatedly taken up as a chant, as the crowd yelled "I am Trayvon Martin".

Let's just say that John Adams could have pled that he was too busy writing the Declaration of Independence to write letters and it wouldn't have got him off the hook with Abigail.

In 2014, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals held that methods of operation can be protected as long as they are also an expression of an idea, and that the merger doctrine does not apply because the API declarations could have been written differently.