Based on the findings of the G study, alternative decision studies were then designed to search for optimal generalizability of CSI.
Many decision studies have demonstrated similar phenomena in various gambles.
However, even after controlling for these non-emotional variables, results of lexical decision studies remain in conflict.
In decision studies, each of the risk-benefit tasks is a system in itself that ought not to be conflated.
By looking at decision studies, we realize that RECs ought to evaluate risks and benefits, appraise risk treatment suggestions, and make the final decision.
The robustness of the decision studies methods stems from the clear distinction between risk-benefit analysis, risk-benefit evaluation, risk treatment, and decision making.
As such, we cannot expect the procedure-level approaches to have the same level of robustness, transparency, explicitness, and coherence as the various approaches of decision studies have.
This is not surprising considering the fact that decision studies have been utilized in many various fields for quite some time now.
However, further work on reliability of the oral viva examination is required, for example, through the use of generalisability analysis and decision studies.
In decision studies, amplifying benefits and modifying risks are possible only after a global understanding of it through risk assessment has been achieved.
It further requires research ethicists to allow decision studies discourses into the current discussion on the risk-benefit tasks of RECs.
