The legitimacy of democratic decisions, then, depends on both procedural values and on the substantive quality of the outcomes that these deliberative decision-making procedures generate.
Medical simulation creates a lifelike situation for individuals to practice decision-making and procedural activities in a safe environment for the patients and professionals where it involves simulated human patients, emergency response and simulated animation.
The procedural aspects of the framework provide a means to ensuring that the values of the community are reflected in decision-making through the procedural principles of inclusiveness and responsiveness.
Expertise in biostatistics is needed to assess the interpretation of such multiple analyses, for example, in the context of regulatory decision-making by optimizing procedural guidance and sophisticated analysis methods.
To obtain reasonable and fair decision-making, the principles of procedural justices state that criteria have to be met such as transparency of and stakeholder participation in decision processes are ensured [ 4, 17, 27].
Medical errors can be categorized as administrative, communication, diagnostic, documentation, medication, surgical or procedural, and decision-making [ 3].
According to pure proceduralism only procedural features of decision-making are relevant for democratic legitimacy.
Such mixed conceptions of democratic legitimacy Peter (2008) calls them "rational proceduralist"—combine conditions that refer to the quality of outcomes of democratic decision-making with conditions that apply to procedural features.
Requisite cognitive skills include declarative information recall, procedural knowledge, and decision-making, as well as skills and abilities relevant to communication and situation awareness such as working memory capacity.
This study has quantitatively assessed the procedural aspects of decision-making such as stakeholder participation and transparency, which have been claimed as relevant for fair and legitimate decision-making [ 17].
