Sentence examples for decision making interventions from inspiring English sources

A Cochrane review of randomized control trials found evidence that shared decision making interventions (through "decision aids") improved a variety of measures associated with decision knowledge and decision quality and tended to result in more conservative treatment options selected rather than invasive surgery options [ 8].

Shared decision making interventions and the use of decision aids should be considered for this area.

To the extent that preferred and actual involvement in decision making differs across clinical decisions, the benefits of shared decision making interventions similar to ours (i.e. including a decision aid, coaching session, and physician education session) may differ across decisions and should be tested.

Four practices within Group C will receive the shared decision making intervention (and become group D).

GJ, GYK were involved in the direct clinical care (diagnosis, decision making, treatment, operative intervention, postoperative care) of patient 1. ER was involved in the direct clinical care (diagnosis, decision making, treatment, operative intervention, postoperative care) of patient 2. KT and KS were involved in the direct clinical care of both patients.

JC, LB, KS, KT were involved in the direct clinical care (diagnosis, decision making, treatment, operative intervention, postoperative care) of the patient and/or the preparation of this manuscript.

Our aim is to explore the likely impact and influence of shared decision-making and shared decision-making interventions on medical malpractice litigation, and patients' intentions to initiate litigation.

We included all observational, interventional and qualitative studies published in all languages, which assessed the effect or likely influence of shared decision-making or shared decision-making interventions on medical malpractice litigation or on patients' intentions to litigate.

According to a recent systematic review [ 44], no firm conclusions can be drawn at present about the effects of shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions although there is no evidence of harm to the patients.

We included all observational, interventional and qualitative studies published in all languages, which assessed the effect or likely influence of shared decision-making (patient participation in decision-making and/or elicitation of patient preferences) or shared decision-making interventions on medical malpractice litigation or on patients' intentions to litigate.

Shared decision-making interventions were defined as the use of tools or strategies designed to engage patients in medical decision-making and/or facilitate shared decision-making and patient activation the medical encounter, by providing information about the options and associated outcomes and implicit methods to clarify values [ 19].