In a decision affirmed by the Supreme Court in 2011, the company was found to have willfully violated the French firm's United States patent, selling the knockoffs even after it was sued.
In 1999, Mexico's Supreme Court ruled that he could be extradited to the United States to face the federal indictments against him there, a decision affirmed by a broader ruling on extradition by the court last year.
The new decision affirmed a ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, in Cincinnati.
The decision affirmed a 2001 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco.
The decision affirmed a ruling last year by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in Richmond, Va., which had rejected the inmate's petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
[Excerpts, Page A20.] The decision affirmed a ruling last year by the federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., dismissing a suit brought by a college student against two varsity football players whom she accused of raping her in her dormitory room shortly after the start of her freshman year.
The decision affirmed a 1998 ruling by the Florida Supreme Court, which suppressed the gun the police had found in the pocket of the 15-year-old subject of the tip, identified only as J. L. The charge against him was never brought to trial.
The 8-to-1 decision affirmed a ruling last year by the federal appeals court here, which declared that it would find the indictment fatally flawed unless the independent counsel's office could prove that it knew in advance, when it issued a far-reaching subpoena for Mr. Hubbell's financial information, that the documents existed and that Mr. Hubbell had them.
This decision was affirmed by the Supreme Court in a decision written by Justice Stevens.
The decision affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit by a patient who was injured during an angioplasty when a balloon catheter burst while being inserted to dilate a coronary artery.
This week, a panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, by a 2-1 decision, affirmed the 2005 "material support" conviction of US-born Hamid Hayat, and it's one of the worst yet most illustrative cases yet (that's US justice: he was convicted 8 years ago, and his appeal is only now decided).
