Traditionally, U.S. courts decided conflicts of law through deference to the principle of lex loci delicti, "the law of the place of the wrong". In the geographically fluid environment of Cyberspace, however, the place of the wrong often is not obvious.
To determine dominance relationship between pair partners, we only used decided conflicts where one partner showed only submissive behaviour and no aggression and the opponent no submissive behaviour, but aggression.
Within each group, a central, dominant male, who is frequently involved in aggressive interactions and is winner in all decided conflicts, could be unambiguously distinguished from all other (subordinate) males (Ostner and Kappeler 1999).
And the Government insists that no previous case in this Court has involved or decided conflicting claims of a state and the Federal Government to the three-mile belt in a way which requires our extension of the Pollard inland water rule to the ocean area.
Rank reversals among subordinate males, i.e., a lower ranking male winning a decided conflict against a higher-ranking male, were also uncommon.
Rather, winning and losing were determined by small length and weight differences, which obviously cause sufficient variation in resource-holding power to decide conflict outcomes (Reddon et al. 2011).
If Mr Cox's SEC could find a way of deciding which conflicts of interest are tolerable and which not, it might win fewer headlines, but leave a more lasting legacy.
It is shown that it is the combination of finite temperature first-principle calculations and the Calphad modeling tool that provides a sound basis for identifying and deciding on conflicting key thermodynamic data in the Ca Sn system.
Charles P. Ewing, a forensic psychologist, lawyer and professor at the University at Buffalo Law School, said he was surprised that hung juries did not happen more often in insanity defense cases, given that jurors are put in the difficult position of deciding between conflicting experts.
Charles P. Ewing, a forensic psychologist, lawyer and professor at the University at Buffalo Law School, said he was surprised that hung juries are not more common in insanity defense cases, given that jurors are put in the difficult position of deciding between conflicting experts.
