Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
These layers are produced from their raw data and combined in the previously decided MCDA framework.
All ten criteria in the DECIDE framework were rated as important in the decision-making process.
The DECIDE framework was developed to support evidence-informed health system decisions through evidence summaries tailored to health policymakers.
The survey focused on stakeholders' perceptions of each of the ten DECIDE framework criteria, the grading of health system evidence, and the use of evidence summaries.
We conducted an international online survey to determine perceptions of the importance and use of the criteria within the DECIDE framework and evidence summaries.
An evidence summary based on the DECIDE framework needs to clearly communicate evidence relating to each of the ten DECIDE framework criteria, including the effect sizes and quality of evidence available for the anticipated desirable and undesirable effects of the intervention being considered.
This survey confirmed the relevance of the criteria that we had identified and incorporated in the DECIDE framework for health system decisions and suggests that the framework is likely to be helpful for informing health system decisions.
Nonetheless, the fact that the criteria included in the DECIDE framework were regarded as important for decision-making by these respondents provides further support for their inclusion in a framework for going from evidence to health system decisions.
To obtain a better understanding of policymakers', managers' and other stakeholders' perceptions of the criteria for health system decisions in the DECIDE framework, and how evidence on these should be presented, we conducted an international online survey.
The objective of this study was to determine policymakers' perceptions regarding the criteria in the DECIDE framework and how best to summarise and present evidence to support health system decisions.
Respondents had generally considered all ten criteria in the DECIDE framework in their own healthcare decisions and consistently rated these criteria as important or probably important to decision-making.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com