decide with whom

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'decide with whom' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you need to decide something with one or more people, such as for example when you need to decide where to go for dinner. Example: We need to decide with whom we want to have dinner tonight.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

Read the arguments and decide with whom you most agree.

The New York Times

Read the thoughts of six experts in this Room for Debate post and decide with whom you most agree.

The New York Times

Mr. Sharon said that Places would have a series of privacy controls intended to give users the power to decide with whom they would share check-ins.

The New York Times - Tech

When she interviewed agents to decide with whom to list the property, she used the information from Mr. Rode to see if the other agents were on target.

The New York Times

A new "How to get into Berghain" app even promises live updates on the length of the queue outside the super-secretive venue with the motto "we decide with whom we want to party".

The Guardian

Last year, following another consumer backlash over changes to its terms of service, Facebook introduced a set of principles that included this: "People should have the freedom to decide with whom they will share their information, and to set privacy controls to protect those choices".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

Deciding with whom your institution is aligned is another.

The Guardian

It is the individual who decides with whom to share that information and under what terms.

The New York Times

There are no rules: just individual organisations deciding with whom they choose to work.

The Guardian

This score belongs to the user, so it's the user who decides with whom and when it's shared.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Under the old studio system executives decided with whom stars would be photographed, says Steve Ross of the University of Southern California, who is writing a book on the subject.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "decide with whom", ensure that the context clearly indicates what decision is being made and the nature of the association or collaboration. Clarity prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "who" in place of "whom" in formal writing. "Whom" is the objective case and should be used when it is the object of a verb or preposition. For example, it is correct to say "decide with whom to collaborate", not "decide with who to collaborate".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "decide with whom" functions as an infinitive phrase with a preposition, typically serving as part of a larger clause. It indicates the act of making a decision regarding the person or people one will associate with.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Wiki

26%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Academia

6%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "decide with whom" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase that expresses making a choice about which person or people to associate with for a particular reason. Ludwig AI confirms its validity. It is common in news and media, wiki and scientific contexts, reflecting various scenarios from personal choices to professional collaborations. While versatile, attention should be paid to using “whom” correctly as the object of a preposition or verb, especially in formal writing. Alternatives include phrases like "determine who to collaborate with" or "choose who to partner with".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Determine who to collaborate with

Replaces "decide" with "determine" and uses "collaborate with" to emphasize a working relationship.

Choose who to partner with

Substitutes "decide" with "choose" and uses "partner with" to highlight a more formal alliance.

Select who to involve

Replaces "decide with whom" with a more direct phrasing focusing on inclusion.

Figure out who to team up with

Uses informal language, replacing "decide" with "figure out" and "team up with" to suggest a cooperative effort.

Settle on who to align with

Implies a more definitive decision, focusing on agreement and association.

Ascertain which individuals to engage

Employs formal language, replacing "decide" with "ascertain" to emphasize careful discovery.

Establish who to include

Focuses on making a firm decision about who will be part of a group or activity.

Opt for who to bring on board

Uses "opt for" to show a preference and "bring on board" to indicate inviting someone to join a team or project.

Resolve who to associate with

Suggests a conclusion after some deliberation about forming a connection.

Pinpoint which people to connect with

Replaces "decide" with "pinpoint" and uses "connect with" to emphasize establishing a link or relationship.

FAQs

How do I properly use "decide with whom" in a sentence?

Use "decide with whom" when you need to express making a choice about the person or people you will be associating with for a specific purpose. For example, "We need to decide with whom we will partner on this project".

Is it grammatically correct to say "decide with who" instead of "decide with whom"?

No, "decide with who" is not grammatically correct in formal English. The correct form is "decide with whom", as "whom" is the objective case pronoun used when it is the object of a verb or preposition.

What are some alternatives to "decide with whom" that I can use?

Alternatives include "determine who to collaborate with", "choose who to partner with", or "select who to involve", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

When is it most appropriate to use the phrase "decide with whom"?

The phrase "decide with whom" is most appropriate in situations where a deliberate choice is being made regarding which individuals or groups to associate with, especially in professional or formal contexts requiring careful consideration of partnerships.