Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The science debate does not work in politics.
Similar(59)
So, early in campaign for the United State Senate, Mr. Franks is clearly reading from Mr. Florio's game plan, and this suggests a question: if attacking Mr. Corzine for his wealth, his unreleased tax returns and his front-runner's instinct to limit debate didn't work for Mr. Florio, what makes Mr. Franks think it will work for him?
In their book, The Ultimate Weapon is no Weapon (Perseus Books, 2010), Shannon Beebe and Mary Kaldor refer to the now familiar argument – deployed in Tuesday's Commons debate - that deterrence does not work against rogue states and terrorists.
Insularity does not work.
Retraining does not work.
Begging does not work.
This does not work.
Nagging does not work.
Well, the wrong way to go about it is to be focussed on him and how to defeat him, to concoct in your mind the masterful zinger that is going to lay flat on the debate stage, because it just doesn't work that way.
Similarly, he said, he would steer clear of the state's debates about abortion and sexual ethics: "Abstinence doesn't work for cows".
That may be acceptable in certain situations, but it doesn't work at a Presidential debate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com