The present paper is split into two parts: Part 1 is about laboratory tests whereas the second part deals with experiments on real bridges.
The present paper is split into two parts: in the first part the different dynamic damage indicators are defined and applied to beam and slab structures under laboratory conditions, whereas the present second part deals with experiments carried out on two real post-tensioned bridges.
The literature was screened in March 2012 for peer-reviewed original research articles dealing with experiments in the abovementioned field.
These examples were chosen to showcase edgeR's ability to deal with experiments of varying size (from tens to thousands of hairpins) and complexity, from two-group situations, to settings with four groups, or a time-course design, where a GLM with a slope and intercept term is most appropriate.
2-D and 3-D are the dimensional spaces that are mostly dealt with in experiments and simulations.
All reports that dealt with animal model experiments were selected then by reading available texts (titles/abstracts/full texts).
The second part will deal with actual experiments.
Terms must be added from other fields to deal with microgravity experiments, human factors and so on.
Adding this sort of joking comment at the end highlights that, as you mentioned, you are accustomed to dealing with failed experiments and how to rectify them.
This paper deals with tribological experiments with alloys of different stability of the austenitic structure in the temperature range between room and liquid helium temperature.
This work deals with bioremediation experiments on harbor sediments contaminated by aliphatic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), investigating the effects of a continuous supply of inorganic nutrients and sand amendments on the kinetics of microbial growth and hydrocarbon degradation.
