deals existed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "deals existed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that certain agreements or arrangements were in place at a specific time in the past. Example: "In the past, several deals existed between the two companies that facilitated collaboration on various projects."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

At one point, Judge Sand asked how many such secret deals existed.

The New York Times

Unflinching and detached, it captures simpler times, when neither MP3s nor 360 degree deals existed and all eyes are on the Next Big Thing.

The Guardian - Music

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

WHERE TO STAY Off-season deals exist all along Copacabana Beach.

The New York Times - Travel

Similar deals exist in some Argentina restaurants too, although they are not so common.

The Guardian - Travel

As long as those deals exist, Google gets almost all the benefit of owning Twitter without the downsides.

The Guardian - Tech

Few studios will single-handedly commit to a high budget of $70m or above – slate financing deals exist to preclude that eventuality, so the studios can share the risk on a big bet, even if it does star Brad Pitt.

The Guardian - Film

Q: Do deals exist whereby two people can spend the New Year period abroad – preferably somewhere warm – for around £300, if they're prepared to book last-minute, after Christmas?

The Guardian - Travel

Our Subsidy Tracker database has some of his New York City deals thanks to that city's great disclosure law, but I assume many more deals exist in other local government records that are not yet online.

HuffPost

The father denied the deal existed.

The Guardian

Sinclair's vice president of news, Scott Livingston, said no such deal existed.

The Washington Post

A spokeswoman for the bank, Eloise Hale, confirmed that such a deal existed, though she declined to discuss its terms.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "deals existed", ensure the context clearly indicates the time frame you are referring to. For example, specify "in the past" or "during that period" to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "deals existed" without providing specific details about the deals. It's more effective to mention the type of deals or the parties involved for clarity. Instead of saying "deals existed", specify what kind of "agreements were in place".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "deals existed" functions as a statement indicating that agreements or arrangements were in place at some point in the past. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "deals existed" is grammatically sound and functions to communicate that agreements or arrangements were in place in the past. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and usability. While not overly common, it is suitable for neutral contexts such as news and business reporting. For more formal or detailed writing, consider alternatives like ""agreements were in place"" or "arrangements were made" to provide greater clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

agreements were in place

Focuses specifically on the existence of formal agreements.

arrangements were made

Emphasizes the process of setting up arrangements, not just their existence.

pacts were established

Suggests more formal or significant agreements.

transactions occurred

Highlights the occurrence of business transactions or exchanges.

understandings were reached

Focuses on mutual understanding rather than formal agreements.

bargains were struck

Emphasizes the negotiation aspect of the deals.

arrangements prevailed

Suggests that arrangements were not only made but remained in effect for some time.

transactions transpired

A more formal way of saying that transactions happened.

agreements were operative

Highlights that agreements were active and in force.

compacts were in effect

Indicates that compacts, similar to agreements, were active.

FAQs

How can I use "deals existed" in a sentence?

You can use "deals existed" to indicate that certain agreements or arrangements were in place at a specific time in the past. For example: "In the past, several "deals existed" between the two companies."

What are some alternatives to "deals existed"?

Some alternatives include ""agreements were in place"", "arrangements were made", or "pacts were established", depending on the specific context.

Is it more appropriate to say "deals existed" or "deals exist"?

"Deals existed" is used when referring to past arrangements. Use "deals exist" when discussing current arrangements.

What's the difference between saying "a deal existed" versus "deals existed"?

"A deal existed" refers to a single agreement, whereas "deals existed" implies multiple agreements or arrangements were in place.