Your English writing platform
Discover Ludwig'deaf for' is not a correct or usable phrase in written English.
If you want to express that someone can't hear something, the phrase 'deaf to' is used. For example, "Despite their repeated attempts to get his attention, he remained deaf to their pleas for help."
Exact(41)
"Fruit flies go deaf for the same reasons you and I do," he says.
The main character in it goes deaf for a while, and so do the audience.
Once I went deaf for three months, but no one noticed.
He toured with the National Theater of the Deaf for three years.
While preparing for "Johnny Belinda," Miss Wyman studied at a school for the deaf for six months, learning sign language.
"I felt something, a blow, and then a whistle left me deaf for a few seconds," he recalled.
Similar(19)
There is the Westgate College For Deaf People for students aged 16 and over, and London House School of English, which provides English language courses for foreign students.
And we have to stand with one another, for one another," Warren said, which struck some activists as tone-deaf for a conference with "New American Majority" as its dominant theme.
Social media users called it out for being egregiously tone-deaf for, you know, implying that soda alone can cure the world of racism, inequality and the rest of its ills.
In the last year, the charity Hearing Dogs for Deaf People has for the first time placed 12 dogs with children.
You wouldn't blame a deaf person for failing to respond to unseen cries for help.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com