Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Cases in which measured level changes of otoacoustic emissions without CAS differed by more than 1 dB from the first measurement without CAS indicated lack of stability of the probe in the external ear canal; such results were excluded from further analysis.
Similar(59)
Accordingly, we used this as a measure of the animal's aversive reaction to the US, which was calculated as the change in dB from the second before versus the second after the onset of foot shock.
In Table 3, the performance of the proposed algorithm with and without applying the conditions is evaluated for different levels of input SNR ranging from 25 to −5 dB for the first utterance considering white Gaussian noise and N f =1014.
We observe that with chip-level combining a maximum of diversity is achieved and the gap between the proposed combining scheme and MFB is reduced from 4 dB in the first transmission to 1 dB in the third transmission at 10-2 BLER.
Our simulation results indicate that LC-ZP-OFDM receiver outperforms the conventional MMSE-ZP-OFDM equalizer by ≈ 3.3 dB without error propagation (EP) from the first stage and by ≈ 0.5 dB with EP from first stage at SER = 10-3.
DB wrote the first draft of the manuscript.
JV and DB wrote the first and subsequent drafts.
These values represent a reduction in magnitude of effect of 2 dB (for 5-year-olds) and 1 dB (for 8-year-olds) from the first experiment, which used stimuli with a consistent harmonic structure across formants.
Sentences were presented at 70 dB SPL, with the first sentence starting at a SNR of 25 dB and each subsequent sentence presented with a 5 dB SNR reduction down to 0 dB SNR.
For the third 'bee rumble', the 129 183 Hz band was reduced in amplitude (−10 dB), and the 78 123 Hz band was amplified (+10 dB), shifting the second formant location from 148.6 to 103.8 Hz.
For one sequence of two rumbles, the frequencies associated with second formants (115 168 Hz) were reduced in amplitude (−10 dB), and lower frequencies (86 115 Hz) were amplified (+10 dB), shifting the second formant location from 132.3 to 104.5 Hz (Figure 5).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com