Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
Simulation results of a 0.18-μm CMOS implementation show that the proposed LNA provides a maximum voltage gain of 25.02 dB and a minimum NF of 2.37 dB from 0.1 to 2.25 GHz.
This paper reports the design and measurement of a UWB receiver with a designed and measured linearity of 17 dBm, a gain of 30.5 dB and a minimum NF of 4.5 dB, which make it suitable for implantable radio applications.
The simulation results show a flat gain (S21>10 dB) with a good input impedance matching less than –10 dB and a minimum noise figure of 2.9 dB over the entire band.
The value is limited to a maximum DCRmax=60 dB and a minimum DCRmin=-10 dB before applying (54).
After limitation of SSDR m to a maximum of SSDRmax=30 dB and a minimum of SSDRmin=-10 dB, the segmental SSDR is proposed to be computed by SSDR seg, m = 1 C ( Λ m ) ∑ λ ∈ Λ m SSDR m.
Similar(54)
Consequently, the as-designed composites with flaky CIPs may exhibit reflection loss (RL) < −6 dB in 2.5 8 GHz and a minimum RL of −11 dB at 4 GHz when the thickness is 1.2 mm.
When using this standard OTS power amplifier, as depicted in Figure 15, the optimum operating point for an OM-OFDM transmission is at a PAPR of 10 dB (where a minimum decision metric occurs) and for the ACE and clipped OFDM transmission the optimum operating points are 12 dB.
The ASD target was being varied from 2.6 dB to a minimum value with a 0.2 dB step.
Conductive hearing loss was defined as an air-bone gap of ≥15 dB at a minimum of two frequencies in either ear.
Post-layout simulation shows that LNA achieves a maximum voltage gain of 13.7 dB, a minimum noise figure of 2.5 dB, better than −10dB S11 and +4.5 to +9.5dBm IIP3 across the entire bandwidth.
With the aid of source degenerated inductor, the simulation results show input return loss S11<−10dB in the frequency range of 3.1 9.7 GHz, a noise figure (NF) less than 1.41 dB, and the minimum noise figure (NFmin) below 1.034 dB in the frequency range of 3.1 10.6 GHz.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com