To date, screening tools for endometrial cancer have not been identified.
To date, screening of only LKB1 and RHEB has been reported [ 23].
Data for both programmes were collated at individual invitee level to include NHS number (identifier), demographic descriptors, invitation date, screening uptake, subsequent assessments and diagnostic outcome.
Information from screening (initial or successive screening, date of screening mammogram, further assessments, the use of SFM or FFDM, and the final outcome of screening) was obtained from the screening program database.
The NCSP database includes information on participants' demographic characteristics, screening date, and screening results.
We hypothesised that being diagnosed with diseases that involve hospital contact close to the screening date affects screening behaviour more than the presence of chronic diseases without recent hospital contact.
Literature searches were completed October 2012 and updated June 2014 with publications dates screened up to the 17 June 2014.
In all multivariable models, having seen a physician in the past year was a significant predictor of an up-to-date screening.
We used data from the Copenhagen mammographic screening register from 1 April 1991 until 14 April 2008, containing ID-number for each women and bi-annual sequence of invitation dates, screening dates, history of reminders, and screening outcome.
Report-to-record ratios indicated that people of poorer self-rated health tended to be more likely to over-report up-to-date screening than those of better self-rated health for both cervical and breast cancer screening.
