Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

datasets were extracted for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "datasets were extracted for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the process of obtaining specific datasets for a particular purpose or analysis. Example: "In this study, datasets were extracted for further analysis of climate change impacts on agriculture."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Study data were recorded on a paper Case Report Form and then entered in a dedicated database maintained in Microsoft Office Access Microsoft Corp.., Redmond, WA), and de-identified datasets were extracted for statistical analyses.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The real annotations for these datasets were extracted from the Affymetrix web server (March , 2012 as GO terms linked to the sequences, or as GO terms extracted from Swiss-Prot IDs linked to the sequences.

Individual datasets were extracted from accepted articles.

Three datasets were extracted from the main database.

The 'Additional info' column in the dataset specifies exactly what datasets were extracted from each study with multiple datasets.

Science

eLife

Following diagnosis a core clinical dataset is extracted for all patients from medical records at each of the 14 HMRN hospitals.

Thus, in this way a "floating", but predetermined, individualised dataset is extracted for analysis; 4 equivalent data are collected from an individually matched IPT case so that cross-treatment, temporally matched, comparisons may be made.

A minimum dataset was extracted for all admissions with any of the following codes: B26 (mumps), N45 (orchitis and epididymitis), A87 (viral meningitis), N70 (oophoritis), and K85 (acute pancreatitis) (19 ).

The start date was the earliest feasible one after the introduction of the new management database in 2005; the end date allowed at least a year for cases to have been investigated by the GMC before the dataset was extracted for analysis in April 2009.

For each pairwise comparison between two datasets, genes for which non-zero values existed in both datasets were extracted, and for each gene the fold difference in reported values was calculated.

The common genes in these datasets were extracted, resulting in 5337 genes for analysis.

Science

Plosone
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "datasets were extracted for", clearly state the purpose for which the datasets were extracted to provide context and clarity. For example, "Datasets were extracted for statistical analysis of climate change impacts."

Common error

Avoid using "datasets were extracted" without specifying the reason. This can leave the reader wondering why the datasets were extracted in the first place, reducing the impact and clarity of your statement.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "datasets were extracted for" functions as a passive construction indicating that datasets underwent extraction for a specific purpose. As Ludwig AI notes, this construction is grammatically correct. Examples show its use in scientific contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "datasets were extracted for" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase, primarily found in scientific contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it indicates that datasets have been obtained for a specific purpose, and clarity is enhanced when that purpose is explicitly stated. While alternatives like "datasets were obtained for" or "datasets were retrieved for" exist, the original phrase remains a precise and appropriate choice for formal writing, especially in research methodologies. The phrase appears with uncommon frequency, signaling that it is employed in specialized domains.

FAQs

What can I say instead of "datasets were extracted for"?

You can use alternatives like "datasets were obtained for", "datasets were retrieved for", or "datasets were selected for" depending on the context.

How to use "datasets were extracted for" in a sentence?

Use the phrase to indicate that datasets were obtained for a specific purpose, for example: "Datasets were extracted for the purpose of analyzing patient outcomes".

What's the difference between "datasets were extracted for" and "datasets were used for"?

"Datasets were extracted for" implies a process of obtaining the data, while "datasets were used for" simply indicates that the data was employed for something. Extraction is about the retrieval or selection, while usage is about the application.

Is it correct to say "datasets were extracted" without specifying the purpose?

While grammatically correct, it's best to specify the purpose for clarity. For example, instead of "datasets were extracted", say "datasets were extracted "for analysis"".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: