Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
In relative protein quantitative analyses, multiple normalised global expression datasets were compared and contrasted.
The two datasets were compared and discrepancies resolved by checking with the original data.
Analyses using both the full and rarefied datasets were compared and, as the results did not differ, usually only those from the rarefied data are reported here.
The genomic locations of the peaks from our FIE-HA and H3K27me3 ChIP-seq datasets were compared and grouped into three categories; FIE-HA+H3K27me3, FIE-HA only and H3K27me3 only.
Similar(56)
The statistical descriptions for the case detectors in each dataset were compared and the results were found to be similar to those for the entire dataset.
The spatial distributions of the NED owner and horse datasets were compared graphically and using maps (created in R statistical software).
The two putatively identical datasets were compared electronically and any undiscovered discordance between the two datasets resulting from double-entry was resolved by rechecking against the original case register and making the necessary corrections in a final dataset that was subsequently used for analysis.
To determine which GO terms [ 64] were over- represented among the gene lineages having undergone positive selection, the functional annotations of the gene family dataset as a whole and the global and tertiary windowing high Ka/Ks datasets were compared to GO, and gene families assigned to a small number of selected GO terms.
Normally distributed datasets were compared using paired and unpaired t tests and all pair-wise group comparisons in non-normally distributed datasets were performed using the Wilcoxon Mann–Whitney test.
The NSHPC and UK CHIC datasets were compared to find and match the records of women reported to both i.e. women in UK CHIC who had been pregnant.
Drug-naïve and NRTI-treated datasets were compared for intra- and inter-group conservation, and differences were determined using Fisher's exact tests.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com