Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
One of the experimental datasets was collected using a GLONASS transmitter and a fixed receiver.
Similar(59)
Montage tomographic datasets were collected using a FEI Tecnai TF20 or a FEI Tecnai TF30 at a magnification of ∼14,500× or ∼15,500×, respectively, using the tilt-series acquisition software SerialEM [56].
Since all datasets were collected using synchrotron radiation, determination of systematically absent reflections should be reliable.
Both datasets were collected using the same inclusion criteria and have a similar distribution of age and ethnicity.
As both datasets were collected using ChIP-Seq, this sharp divergence is more likely biological than technical: PC3 cells do not express androgen receptor endogenously and its AR binding was profiled following transfection of an AR construct [ 11].
The second dataset was collected using Galileo as the transmitter, while the receiver was mounted on a ground moving vehicle (Figure 14).
One dataset was collected using a narrative interview approach, (n = 13) and the other using a postal survey (n = 82).
An initial native dataset was collected using the Rigaku software then indexed and scaled using the HKL2000 package (Otwinowski et al. 2003).
The second dataset (GEO accession ID: GSE6956 [ 10]), which was used as the testing dataset, was collected using the Affymetrix Human Genome U133A 2.0 array for 69 fresh-frozen prostate tumors and 20 control samples from surrounding normal prostate tissue [ 10].
The PPP dataset was collected using low and high performance mass spectrometers including LCQs, LTQs, QTOFS, QSTARS and also an FT-ICR by one laboratory, and was processed using different searching algorithms such as Mascot and Sequest.
The dataset used in this work was collected using twelve low-interaction honeypots [16] installed in ten different country codes: two in Brazil, two in the United States and one in each of Argentina, Australia, Austria, Ecuador, Netherlands, Norway, Taiwan and Uruguay.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com