Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
The first part is used as the initial part of the training dataset, while the second part is used to test the ANN during the training process.
The first section was used for training and contains 70% of the dataset, while the second section was used for testing and contains the remaining 30% of the dataset.
The first set contained loci from the whole dataset while the second set included only loci identified as novel based on previous studies [ 27, 38– 44] and the dbRIP database [ 45].
Similar(57)
Two sets of proteins were used: the first included proteins conserved in all nidoviruses (3CLpro, RdRp, HEL1) (dataset D1), while the second set additionally included ExoN and OMT, which are conserved in large-sized nidoviruses and CAVV/NDiV (dataset D2).
Table 4 shows the results for the First 454 MAQC dataset, while results for the Second 454 dataset are presented in Table S2 in Additional File 1.
With the first dataset, we test the ability of the methods to classify compounds, while the second dataset is employed to examine the ability to rank actives among decoys.
The first set of experiments (combination1) employed datasets (i) & (ii) while the second set of experiments (combination2) employed (iii) & (iv).
The first dataset included any of the 3666 genes that were identified as significant on either platform, while the second dataset included only the 278 genes that were significantly changed on both platforms.
The first one is the Watertight dataset of the Shrec benchmark while the second one is the Princeton Shape Benchmark, widely used in the 3D content-based retrieval community.
At low dilution rate, one isocitrate lyase (msmeg_3706) was upregulated while the second copy msmeg_0911 was downregulated (Dataset S1).
The first dataset was much larger than the second because it included all cows, while the second contained only cows that had developed mastitis at least once.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com