Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
All four BP and NBP features in the original feature dataset were selected to the optimal feature set, which revealed that BP and NBP features contribute mostly to distinguish RNA-binding proteins from nonbinding ones.
Similar(59)
Second, joints with high discrimination for the whole dataset are selected to design feature.
This dataset was selected to determine if it was possible to distinguish the difference between a real dataset that did not undergo a significant perturbation and random responses.
When multiple probes were mapped to the same GeneID (EntrezGene identification number), the one with the highest variance in a particular dataset was selected to represent the GeneID.
The RDP sequence with the highest number of corresponding pyrosequencing reads, in the entire dataset, was selected to represent each phylotype.
When multiple probes were mapped to the same GeneID, the one with the highest variance in a particular dataset was selected to represent the GeneID.
At the lower left corner of Fig. 1B, two genes tauA (b0365) and tauB (b0366), which might be related to gene cysN (b2751) in the dataset are selected to apply the scatter plotting.
Our second dataset was selected to test the feasibility of arrays and barcodes in a dense and species-rich neotropical mammalian fauna: 840 individuals from 87 species of bats.
The dataset was selected to include all grades of lateral JSN (n = 25 knees per lateral JSN grade) and knees with and without lateral JSN progression (JSN grade change between baseline and follow-up visit).
Each protein in the dataset was selected to have the highest annotated domain coverage and the highest number of protein chains within its homology class, while setting an upper bound of 20 protein chains for oligomeric protein complexes.
The first dataset was selected to allow comparison of the sequence information in the two genes from the same individuals of the same species in a wide taxonomic assemblage of mammals.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com