Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Neither dataset showed significant differences in co-expression level between conserved and non-conserved adjacent pairs (p > 0.01, KS test).
Similar(59)
For the unemployment dataset, none of the methods showed significant differences except the "Only female" method ((Delta mathrm {MAPE}=+2.1%), (U=76), (p<0.05)), though all filtering methods led to a (non-significant) improvement in the median, despite using less data than the baseline.
Eulemur collaris and E. rufifrons showed significant differences in all 4 datasets and E. rufifrons and E. rufus differed significantly in pelage coloration, genetics and acoustic parameters.
The prognosis dataset contained a single representative microarray probe for each transcription factor, therefore all of them showed significant differences (Fig. 3A).
Thirty-nine of the 50 RSCU combinations (78%) showed significant differences (P < 0.05) in all 10 analyzed subdatasets, six combinations were significantly different in 9 of 10 datasets, and the others had a minimum of 6 datasets that showed significant differences in codon usage bias among tissues.
None of them showed significant differences among the three groups.
Further areas also showed significant differences.
Results showed significant differences for all antioxidant properties tested and multiple significant correlations between these properties.
The results showed significant differences.
However, qualification and profession showed significant differences.
No comparison showed significant difference.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com