Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(18)
The standardized iHS score is −2.12 in for the NPY1R/NPY5R locus in the Dutch dataset and this correlates with a empirical p-value of 0.05.
Not only does this improved data quality allow a much better modeling, but we almost doubled the Gene ontology Annotation Quality (GAQ) score [25] (a quantitative measure of the GO annotation) of the proteins in our dataset and this will be valuable for others (the annotations are available at the AgBase database ([29]; www.agbase.msstate.edu).edu
In addition, cassette-encoded 4-carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.44) also implicated in benzoate degradation, was identified in our dataset and this enzyme groups with homologs from Shewanella, a genus that has generated much interest in the field of bioremediation given its ability to use a diversity of electron acceptors (Figure 2B).
Data on ex-smokers was not consistent in all registry dataset and this variable was not used in the analysis.
To date, more than 100 species are listed in the current Unigene dataset and this number continues to increase.
iCLIP has generated a huge dataset and this is an initial analysis of the RNA-binding data for SAFB1.
Similar(42)
Consequently, the RF method is more suitable for building a classification model for this dataset and the 2D descriptors can characterize molecules of this dataset more adequately.
This should, however, only be interpreted in terms of this dataset and the associated analysis.
We applied LCPI to this dataset, and since this cohort differed in platform, we used the best cutoff values to separate patients into different risk groups.
Then, we calculated the average response amplitude and the average noise amplitude from this bootstrapped dataset and repeated this process 10,000 times to obtain the 95% confidence intervals.
NB was involved in the design of this study, analysis of the dataset and drafted this manuscript.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com