Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
Patent information activities since 1993 have been directed towards the enhancement of internal databases, of free-of-charge external databases, publications, and dissemination of information.
In these databases, publications were available since 1982 and 1989, respectively.
In this study, we focused on the canonical pathways, i.e.: the c2.cp library of "molecular signature database" of GSEA software (v2.0.4), which included 639 curated gene sets (canonical pathways) from online pathway databases, publications in PubMed, and knowledge of domain experts.
Gene set C2 (curated gene sets) includes genes from online pathway databases, publications in PubMed, and knowledge from domain experts.
When genes are referred to in databases, publications and other methods of communication, the gene symbol should be unambiguously defined to eliminate misinterpretation.
The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) [ 13] is a database that collects gene sets from various sources, including online pathway databases, publications in PubMed, and the knowledge of domain experts.
Similar(54)
The PubMed, Medline Express and Winspirs databases (publication years 1978-2001) were searched to identify pertinent articles.
A list of links will appear under Database corresponding to the categories of information that can be entered in the database (Publications, Lectures, Comm ittees)/Service, Grants, etc.).
Published articles were retrieved using searches performed on: 1) electronic databases (MEDLINE and Cochrane database publications), 2) Cross-reference from original publications and review articles, and 3) manual searching of bibliographic references.
IOM also recommended that computer code and computational methods be fully shared, either through a public database, publication or in the process of regulatory review.
Typically, public databases reference publications on the original genome sequencing and annotation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com