Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(19)
Four STs of the MLST database were excluded from analysis since representing extreme outgroup isolates (ST102, ST125, ST133) or a lack of a phylogentic group designation (ST103) [11].
Serological tests with missing results in the database were excluded from the analysis (N = 6202).
Trainees who had submitted fewer than 20 colonoscopies to the database were excluded from further analysis, yielding 651 trainees.
b26 specimens (China, n = 11; Vietnam, n = 15) could not be linked with the clinical database were excluded from analysis.
Genes with no interactions in the database were excluded from the validation to avoid possible problems due to annotation incompatibilities.
Patients without valid data in both the anesthesia information system and the STS database were excluded from this analysis.
Similar(41)
Any contigs that showed significant matches to non-plant databases were excluded from further analysis.
Two hundred eighty-eight transcripts for which there were no descriptions in the available databases were excluded from further analysis.
Six questionnaires from the Volunteer Database were excluded.
Variants present in single nucleotide polymorphism database (dbSNP) were excluded from further analysis.
Northern tree shrew, cow, horse, little brown bat, and nine-banded armadillo species were also present in OrthoMaM database but were excluded from the analyses to ensure a comparison of outcomes against a well-resolved and uncontroversial phylogenetic tree.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com