Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(60)
We provide a descriptive overview of systematic reviews of qualitative evidence assessing health and social care interventions included on the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE).
To examine the research translation phase focus (T1 T4) of systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE).
Includes Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; Cochrane Database of Methodology Reviews; Cochrane Methodology Register; Health Technology Assessment Database and NHS Economic Evaluation Databasee.
We searched four international databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effect ) and three Chinese databases (Chinese Biomedical Databases, Wan Fang Digital Journals and Taiwan Periodical Literature Databases) from their inception through July 2014 to identify potential SRs.
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects.
EBM Reviews - Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects <2nd Quarter 2011>.
The literature review published by Phillips et al. [8] is mentioned by database of abstracts of reviews of effects (DARE).
The primary database used was MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL), and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE).
The NSF provides a similar awards database of abstracts from 1989 to recent awards, with information regarding duration of award, how much the investigator received, and the program manager at NSF who handled the proposal.
We searched (1966 2008) Database of Abstracts and Reviews of Effects, The Cochrane library, and Medline.
Key word search was conducted in EBM Reviews - Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (all to 4th Quarter 2008).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com