Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Both Filter 1 and Filter 2 are conservative and the reads after the filtering all matched uniquely to the Entrez gene database (could be more than one RefSeqs due to alternative splicing).
Similar(59)
As Chi Luu points out at JSTOR Daily — the blog of a database of academic journals, what could be more hipster than that?
The company claims you can be up and running in 4-clicks, but in reality if you are migrating an existing database to Cloud Spanner, it could be more complex.
RScan could perform more efficiently on this filtered structural database and the structural alignments could be more significant.
If the database has good query optimization routines this could be more efficient than it would have been if several separate AQL queries were executed and their results were combined in application code.
There could be more.
Less could be more.
Nothing could be more inspiring.
What could be more natural?
What could be more fun?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com