We should highlight that there are more quality attributes that should be focused on, which we intend to do in future work, and, thus, that this table does not intend to show that "one database is better than another", but, rather, that some database is better for a particular use case scenario where these attributes are needed.
In any case, genomic databases are better off when they are free and publically accessible.
IMGT, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system [ 17, 18] with its specialized sequence (IMGT/LIGM-DB) and gene (IMGT/GENE-DB [ 19]) databases is better suited for this purpose.
These database technologies are better adapted to meet the requirements of large-scale (web) infrastructures handling Big Data by providing elastic and horizontal scalability.
While established players such as Oracle, I2 and Siebel will participate in the next upswing, newer companies such as Agile Software, that help customers take advantage of their existing database infrastructure, are better positioned.
While such established players as Oracle, I2 and Siebel will participate in the next upswing, newer companies, such as Agile Software, that help customers take advantage of their existing database infrastructure are better positioned.
There is not a single solution which is better than all the others; however, there are some databases that are better to solve specific problems.
The performances of the proposed metric evaluated on the synthesized video quality database SIAT [11] are better than the performances of the commonly used image/video quality assessment methods.
Among the changes are better databases for skull measurements used to determine ancestry; 3-D identification software for processing measurements and aiding in producing reconstructions of a face; and isotope analysis.
Among these three methods, the two methods using the target genome promoter sequence database for searching TFBS motifs are better with much lower false positives.
