Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Finally, the stability charts analysis method (SCAM) was verified against the numerical solutions; the results showed that 70.63% of the data had discrepancies of less than ± 10%, and the data with discrepancies greater than ± 10% were associated with high values of geological strength index (GSI) and horizontal seismic acceleration coefficient (Kh).
Two independent investigators interpreted the data, with discrepancies resolved by a third investigator.
Articles were reviewed independently by two reviewers and data with discrepancies were discussed by all authors.
Two authors (ER and KD) independently extracted a standard set of data, with discrepancies resolved by discussion.
A second reviewer checked extracted data with discrepancies resolved through consensus between the first and second reviewers.
Similar(55)
Two researchers will independently perform data extraction, with discrepancies resolved through consensus.
Reasonable agreement was obtained for mean velocity data, with some discrepancies due to the limited length of the inlet tube.
The results show that the closure behavior predicted by the proposed model is in good agreement with experimental test data, with small discrepancies between the predicted and the measured values.
It fits the experimental data with a discrepancy χab of 1.48.
In particular, the highest quality data with the fewest discrepancies is the high potency actives data.
Data were double entered, with discrepancies resolved by checking the original data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com