Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
All data were reviewed by AMS and any discrepancies were resolved among reviewers.
Both qualitative and quantitative data were reviewed.
Patient demographic and pre- and postprocedural laboratory data were reviewed.
Clinic records and cytology laboratory data were reviewed.
Main Outcome Measures: Ulnar motor latency data were reviewed.
The data were reviewed in the American College of Physicians-American Society of IntereportediciNo Health Insuranceh INo Health Insurance
Time series plots of the discharge data were reviewed to identify outliers.
In this work, the important factors influencing the analyzed results using sorption data were reviewed.
Clinical and radiological data were reviewed.
Data were reviewed using descriptive statistics.
Clinical, radiologic, operative, and pathologic data were reviewed and analyzed.
More suggestions(15)
data were investigated
data were discussed
data were examined
data were scrutinized
records were reviewed
data were interviewed
data were reexamined
instructions were reviewed
datasets were reviewed
data were revised
data were inspected
data were reconsidered
collected were reviewed
documentation were reviewed
data processing were reviewed
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com