data were recovered for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "data were recovered for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the retrieval of data related to a specific subject or event. Example: "After the system crash, data were recovered for the last three months of transactions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

In total, 13 cattle and 12 badgers were fitted with data loggers and data were recovered for all individuals (Tables 3 & 4).

Plosone

By applying high-stringency sequence quality and transcript coverage filtering, high fidelity transcription data were recovered for more than 13000 transcripts.

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Related cost data were recovered from the hospital cost accounting system database for 2010 and 2011.

Health Economics Review

The HDRA data were recovered from https://ricediversity.org/data/.org/data/

Rice

Data was recovered from the Trust's registry database for the period spanning from April 2009 to March 2010.

BMC Health Services Research

Palaeovegetational data were recovered either side of this period.

Journal of Archaeological Science

The data were recovered with the Millennium 2.15 software (Waters).

Plosone

The data were recovered with WinWedge software (TAL Technologies, Philadelphia, PA, USA).

BMC Nephrology

Two of the 3 DTAG deployments were recovered for data extraction (Table 3).

BMC Ecology

Using the recovered GO data, and a starting node in the hierarchy, the script then looks for nodes below the starting node in the hierarchy for which GO data was recovered in the transcriptome data in order to determine the coverage of the sub-hierarchy.

BMC Genomics

-How might wind data be recovered indirectly?

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "data were recovered for", ensure the context clearly indicates what the data was recovered for. Be specific about the purpose or application of the recovered data to provide clarity.

Common error

Avoid stating only that "data were recovered" without specifying the reason or context for which the data are being used. This lack of context can leave the reader wondering about the significance of the recovery.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "data were recovered for" typically functions as a passive construction indicating that information has been successfully retrieved for a specific purpose. Ludwig provides numerous examples where this phrase is used in scientific and journalistic contexts to describe the recovery of data for analysis or investigation.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "data were recovered for" is a grammatically sound phrase used to indicate the successful retrieval of data for a specific purpose. Ludwig's examples and AI analysis confirm its correctness and usability. While relatively common, especially in scientific and journalistic contexts, it's crucial to specify the purpose for which the data was recovered to ensure clarity. Related phrases include "data were retrieved for" and "data were obtained for", offering alternative ways to express the same idea with subtle differences in emphasis. By providing clear context and choosing precise alternatives, you can effectively communicate the recovery and utilization of data in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

data was retrieved for

Changes verb tense and number agreement to singular.

data was extracted for

Replaces "recovered" with "extracted", implying a more direct removal of data.

data were obtained for

Uses "obtained" instead of "recovered", suggesting a general acquisition of data.

data were restored for

Emphasizes bringing data back to a previous state, implying a recovery from loss or damage.

data were regained for

Similar to "restored", but implies a reclaiming of data that was previously lost.

data were accessed for

Focuses on accessing data, rather than the process of recovering it.

information was found for

Broadens the scope to "information" instead of "data", indicating a more general finding.

insights were gathered for

Shifts the focus to the insights derived from the data, rather than the data itself.

evidence was collected for

Replaces "data" with "evidence", emphasizing the use of data as proof or support.

figures were compiled for

Replaces "data" with "figures", emphasizing numerical data.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "data were recovered for" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "data were retrieved for", "data were extracted for", or "data were obtained for". These alternatives, like "data were obtained for", often convey a sense of professionalism and precision in academic or business writing.

Is it always necessary to specify what the data was recovered for?

While not always grammatically required, specifying the purpose adds clarity and context. Omitting the purpose might leave the reader wondering about the significance of the data recovery. Therefore, including it is generally recommended.

What's the difference between "data were recovered for" and "data were restored for"?

"Data were recovered for" simply means the data was retrieved. "Data were restored for", like "data were restored for", implies the data was brought back to a previous state, often after loss or corruption. Restoration suggests a repair or reversal of damage.

Can I use "data was recovered for" instead of "data were recovered for"?

The correct form depends on whether you treat "data" as singular or plural. In formal writing, "data" is generally considered plural, so "data were recovered for" is preferred. However, "data was recovered for" is acceptable in more informal contexts.