Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(30)
Discordances between the CR and complete mtDNA sequence data were noted.
No significant differences in baseline data were noted between the two groups.
No consistent data were noted for the orientation of the proximal and middle phalanx in relation to the palmar angle.
The hospital records of the corresponding patients were retrieved and clinical data were noted.
The factors that are significant (with eigenvalues more than one and explaining for the higher percentage of the variability of the data) were noted.
Augmentations of immunoglobulin production from 310 to 560% over that expected on the basis of individual culture data were noted in co-cultures of one of the infants' cells with two different unrelated normal control cells.
Similar(30)
Data collection was carried out through a pre-established record where data are noted.
The Rolph and Shaw (1985) correction to Shaw (1974) data is noted in the database.
All areas of missing data are noted in the text or tables.
Statistically significant data are noted by asterisks (*, p<0.05).
Missing data was noted.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com