Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(60)
These data were considered to be proxies for daily data.
The data were considered to be consistent with a normal distribution.
Thirteen fifteenn) land uses (types of soils) and a range of fourteen years (2000 to 2013) of CG-lightning flash data were considered to complete the study.
The indices tested (some applied for the first time to benthic macrofaunal data) were considered to be complementary to traditional environmental assessment metrics and each might be used under different circumstances.
Data were considered to be statistically different for P <0.05.
The experimental data were considered to be statistically different from control data when P<0.05.
Data were considered to be significantly different when at least 80% of individuals were outside these confidence limits.
Statistics were performed with aid of Origin 7.0 (Microcal) and Jump 7.0; data were considered to be significantly different when p<0.05 (by ANOVA or paired t-test for multiple comparisons).
Parameter sets were then ranked based on the value of the sum of the absolute differences for all of the time points; those parameter sets with the lowest values (i.e., smallest difference compared to the empiric data) were considered to be more consistent with the empiric survival data.
Data were considered to be significant at p < 0.05.
Data were considered to be statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com