Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Data were compared from subjects receiving TDP (n = 156) in two RCTs and Take Control (n = 155) in another two RCTs.
Scattering data were compared from initial and final images with no significant changes observed in either scattering form or calculated Rg values.
Similar(58)
Genotypes obtained from the sequencing data were compared with those from the SNP array.
Patient data were compared with data from nonparticipating academic ICUs, extracted from the National Intensive Care Evaluation database.
Sequencing data were compared to data from the wild strains CB4856 and ED3054 (generated from the same Illumina flow cells) to establish the ancestral status of each change.
The measured postirradiation examination data were compared with data from previous irradiations and the design criteria required for HANARO fuel.
The good-quality data were compared with predictions from 6 equations of state.
A subset of eight healthy subjects and the canine data were compared to results from previously validated "gold standard" software (FindTags).
The data were compared with those from 64 healthy volunteers.
The collected data were compared to those from the last examination.
These data were compared with those from 2 and 30 min to verify appropriate time-dependent changes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com